The role of government in environmental issues



Jim and I spent Sunday afternoon hiking on Roan Mountain, part of the Pisgah and Cherokee National Forests, located along the border between North Carolina and Tennessee. The altitude (6000 feet) offers conditions that allow huge clusters of wild Rododendron to grow in open spaces and along sunny edges of the forest. Hiking trails lead through a luxuriant spruce-fir forest. Yesterday a light fog made the forest seem especially dark and mysterious.

It saddens me to think that a century ago little more than tree stumps occupied this beautiful space. During the 1920s and 1930s logging companies cut all of the marketable timber, leaving the land as we see in the photo above. In 1911 the Weeks Act had authorized the Federal Government to purchase forest land in the Eastern United States. In 1941 the government bought much of the land on Roan Mountain and added it to the Pisgah and Cherokee National Forests. Today about 4 percent of North Carolina’s land is National Forest.

These two incidents—deforestation and the establishment of National Forests—represent a current controversy. Is there any reason to believe that capitalism without regulations would not again decimate our natural resources? Already 500 mountain tops have been removed so that mining companies can more cheaply get the coal. Now fracking threatens to poison our ground water and cause earthquakes.

And what should the government spend money on? Had the government not purchased deforested mountain land in the early twentieth century, we wouldn’t have our National Forests.

Personally, I trust corporations far less than I fear Big Government.

4 thoughts on “The role of government in environmental issues

  1. Hey Nancy, thanks for sharing. I agree, I’m saddened too by the deforestation of pretty much the whole East Coast. When out in nature, there’s always an underlying sadness to think how much more lovely they would be if they weren’t cut down in the early 1900s. And I agree, we need government regulation of corporations or it’s pretty much a race to the bottom.

    Where did the logging companies get the land from in the 1920s? Private owners? I’ve also heard of the forest service more recently selling off old grove US forest land for logging in the Pacific Northwest. Those corporate interests can easily infiltrate government. I think ultimately it comes down to not only regulating, but preventing corporate interests from overwhelming public interests.

    • Lindsay,
      Thanks for your remarks. You raise an interesting question: how the logging industry got the land in the first place. I’ll try to check into that. I know that Vanderbilt bought a lot of land, which is now part of Pisgah National Forest, for the purpose of restoring it after it had been logged. Oh, that more wealthy people put their money to that kind of use instead of fighting regulation and putting big bucks into political campaigns.

      Keep up the important work you’re doing. Are you blogging about your experiences? I’m assuming you’re still working on sustainability issues.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s